![]() And it sounds like from your testing the update required may be minimal. I did see the post you mentioned on the Path Finder pages. Please don’t be shy and propose your own tips.īeen doing further investigation and testing this evening. I plan to update this post with more alternatives. The promotion works by entering the coupon code TOTALFINDER at their online store. Path Finder is 50% OFF for TotalFinder users Then we have traditional apps which are full Finder replacements: PathFinder, ForkLift and DiskOrder.ĮDIT: Other users kindly suggested Transmit, Unclutter, DCommander, CRAX Commander and Files for OSX.ĬRAX Commander is also offering 50% off to TotalFinder users. I came across this brand new file manager Commander One, which looks promising, give it a try!Īn offer for TotalFinder users: 50% Off on Commander One PRO Pack The direct alternative XtraFinder has the same problem as TotalFinder. I decided to compile a list of alternatives for users who are looking for a replacement. The appearance of folder tabs under macOS is non-standard and ugly.Since TotalFinder does not launch with System Integrity Protection under El Capitan. It is non-standard, because it doesn't take up the entire width of the File panel (as it is the case with the Finder or with Commander One under macOS, for example). (Why is there a dark grey area at all? In the Windows and Linux versions of Double Commander, there are not two shades of grey here, but only one.) It is ugly, because the folder tabs are located in the middle between the light grey and the dark grey area.Īnother valid option would be to put the folder tabs to the left hand side (as it is the case with Crax Commander under macOS). Same problem with Cocoa version from snapshots, see screenshot2.jpg. In addition, with that version, the font sizes of some gui objects are too small, and the app icons are damaged and have different sizes, see screenshot2.jpg. I don't see a big difference with standard tabs: PS: Meanwhile I updated to macOS Big Sur, maybe the new problems have something to do with that, don't know. Please find attached screenshots from the leading file managers on Mac: Finder (from Apple), ForkLift, Path Finder, Crax Commander, Commander One. These can be regarded as the "standard" on macOS. In my opinion, the appearance of folder tabs in Double Commander should be adapted to that standard. ![]() It is true that tabs in other contexts look different, but here in this ticket we are talking about the special case of folder tabs. I have checked again the QT version of Double Commander under Big Sur. It has new problems which were not present under Catalina: The font size of the path bar is too small, and the text in the folder tabs looks weird. Please check it yourself, then you'll see what I mean. Furthermore, the app icons of many apps (e.g. ![]() ![]() Pages.app or GarageBand.app) are missing. The Cocoa version of Double Commander has even more problems: All app icons are broken there.Īlso tabs in Safari follow that standard. May be these applications use some other control instead NSTabView. Update : I have uploaded a screenshot of doublecmd-0.9.10-9640.qt.x86_64 on macOS Big Sur.ġ. The font of the folder tab is drawn outlined (not filled) -> almost unreadable.Ģ. Many program icons are completely missing or shown as question marks.ģ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |